Search for: "DOE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
District Court held than an employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority could, pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act [29 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
To accommodate consumer demand, airports across the country have built infrastructure for car rental firms, including dedicated facilities, airport transit, and parking areas. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Area Transit Auth., 2020 U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455, involving bus-advertisement policies that prohibit religious themes, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, issued an opinion respecting denial. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
” However, the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, known as WMATA, rejected the advertisement because of its religious nature. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
Washington, fails to protect the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and the 14th Amendment right to due process when, in death-penalty cases involving flagrantly deficient performance, courts can deny relief following a truncated “no prejudice” analysis that does not account for the evidence amassed in a habeas proceeding and relies on a trial recor [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Lobbyists who have a smaller salary and work in specialist areas or for public interest groups are less overconfident, or even underestimate their success. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Note: The author thanks Brittany Moore for contributing to statutory research for this piece. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (DC Cir., July 31, 2018), the D.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:13 am
Yet a D.C. district court has upheld a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority exclusion that was nearly identical to the one struck down in Rosenberger. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (D DC, Dec. 8, 2017), the DC federal district court upheld advertising Guidelines of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority which, among other things, bar transit vehicle ads "that promote or oppose any religion, religious practice or belief. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, March 10, 2015, Motz, D.). [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:38 pm
Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The facts of the case are rather simple. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:23 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the plaintiff Veronica Tinsley was at the Cheverly Metro Station in Maryland when she slipped and fell on the wet platform. [read post]
