Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 1 - 20 of 19,447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2024, 10:14 am by Eleonora Rosati
Such a mandate is not limited to Article 7(1)(f): it applies to all absolute grounds for refusal/invalidity.In what follows it is detailed – in brief – how the Grand Board came to the conclusion that no registration should be granted.Contrariety to public policy and accepted principles of moralityContrariety to Article 7(1)(f) was found to subsist because, in essence, ‘COVIDIOT’ is a word that, while it serves to indicate in a derogatory fashion a person or… [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 9:07 am
  Baab and Jungk focused on sphere of influence, at the time a popular framework, which was eventually reconceived as leverage and built into UNGP Principle 19 and human rights due diligence. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Yuval Shany
If #Israel actively investigates the two suspects for substantially the same conduct at the OTP, it can challenge admissibility under Art. 19. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 253 and concluded that “the invalidity of … claim 1 because of double patenting, even if true, does not necessarily require the invalidation of claims 5, 19, 40, and 43. [read post]
30 May 2024, 6:42 am
. ('Letter from John Ruggie toSaskia Wilks and Johannes Blanenbach’ (19 September 2019) )  I have been working on the production of a comprehensive commentary of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
28 May 2024, 3:20 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
For other COVID 19 related immigration updates please visit our Immigration and COVID-19 Resource Center here. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am by Giles Peaker
Section 23 does not refer to a requirement to provide accommodation under Part VI of the Act for the straightforward reason that there is, as Lord Justice Bean explains, no such requirement. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:19 am by admin
 However, the Final Rule does include a transitional period with timetables for compliance according to (1) hazardous substances and (2) hazardous mixtures. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[13] The scope of the incident response program covers all customer information and is intentionally broader than that of the notification requirement, which only covers “sensitive customer information,” as discussed below.[14] 1. [read post]