Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 4,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2023, 7:32 am by Unreported Opinions
STATE OF MARYLAND appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 8:09 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Vacated sentence — Rule of lenity A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City found Dominic Spencer, Appellant, guilty of possession of a regulated firearm […] [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 7:02 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Marijuana Dominic Whitehead, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of possession of cocaine, distribution of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 7:52 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Standard of proof — Sufficiency of evidence Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of second degree murder and related offenses, Trayon Dominic […] [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:56 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to enforce plea agreement — Existence of agreement This is an interlocutory appeal of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County’s denial of appellant Paolo Dominic Belarmino’s (“Belarmino”) motion to enforce a plea agreement. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post DACA Debate Dominates Supreme Court’s Week appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
The recent United States Supreme Court decision in Marshall v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 7:01 am by Donald Dinnie
Ibex RSA Holdco Limited and Another v Tiso Blackstar Group (Pty) Ltd and Others (Case No 862/2022) [2024] ZASCA 166 (4 December 2024) [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:45 am by admin
  The Tribunal was also critical of the Bureau not only for, in the Tribunal’s view, endeavoring to depart from established authority (the Canada Pipe case) but also from its own recently amended Abuse of Dominance Guidelines, which expressly refer to the requirement for competing firms and do not state that a dominant firm does not need to compete in a relevant market. [read post]