Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 4,449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This Article reexamines and reconceptualizes Justice Louis Brandeis’s dictum in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy International has published an article titled, ‘Generative AI won’t take over the world, surveillance capitalism already has,’ which argues that targeted advertising will come to dominate generative AI, and with it, exploitation of users’ personal data and incursion on their privacy. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
The claim alleges that Google abused its dominant position in the adtech market, causing huge losses to UK publishers worth as much as £13.6bn. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
Last updated: 07/31/2022 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:49 pm
The authors compare the court’s approach with that of courts in Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  In a nutshell, what went from a roundly-criticized, morally-bankrupt letter from Harvard student groups became a dominant view on college campuses across the country, in many cases backed by faculty members, if not fostered by the schools themselves. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
The Order – if it survives legal challenge – gives the FCC jurisdictional authority over the dominant communications medium of modern times. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
We begin with the framework that dominated the discussion at oral argument: the civil rule in the 1982 Supreme Court case of Nixon v. [read post]