Search for: "DUKE UNIVERSITY v. UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS INC." Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
Some production companies have even devoted entire legal departments to this endeavor. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
” The draft specification is intended to serve as a standard for companies to build such capabilities into their products. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am by centerforartlaw
For example, Dirty Monitor did not register the photographs of Van Gogh’s paintings that they used in their exhibit, but they did register all other cinematographic material, the additional new footage, and the production as a motion picture. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
See DePuy Synthes Products Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Telegram Group, Inc. and Ton Issuer Inc. which sought a temporary restraining order (TRO), the SEC has reached yet another crypto-related milestone. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:24 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Background In October 2015, a physician employed by Southern Illinois University and SIU Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Scott Hervey
  The Southern District of New York, in granting trademark protection to Kryptonite, summed up the policy reason why trademark protection may be granted to a fictional element fo an entertainment property, not yet used in a traditional trademark manner:   [W]here the  the product sold by plaintiff is “entertainment” in one form or another, then not only the advertising of the product but also an ingredient of the product itself can amount to a… [read post]