Search for: "Dailey v. Societe Generale"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
As Federal District Court Justice Sweet noted, citing Dailey v Societe Generale, 108 F.3d 451, an employee who has been subject to discriminatory discharge is required to mitigate his damages.In Greenway v Buffalo Hilton Hotel, 143 F.3d 47, the Second Circuit explained that this duty means that the discharged employee ‘must use reasonable diligence in finding other suitable employment,’ which need not be comparable to [his] previous… [read post]