Search for: "Dash v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Gig workers, after all, typically include drivers for Uber, Lyft, Door Dash, and Amazon, all of whom became suddenly very important during the Covid-19 pandemic. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
Casella v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
Kroh v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
There are rare patent cases that challenge the validity of the patent statutes or the way those statutes are applied by the PTO (e.g., Apple v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
In Navroth v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am
In Free Holdings v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
For more than a few years — at least since the United States Supreme Court’s seminal 2017 decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am
Initiative v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
In addition to the Illinois patients, there are patients in other states, but the Illinois officials did not report what states are involved. [read post]
