Search for: "David Brown v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Professor Paul Wragg wrote an article for Inforrm, arguing that coverage of Dr Michael Mosley’s death by Chief News Correspondent for The Times, David Brown was insensitive and in breach of the Editors’ Code of Practice. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
App’x 76); the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm
“On May 16, in celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Supreme Court Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
Wanda Little Fenimore, The Rhetorical Road to Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
S. 825 and Dolan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:45 am
Facts: This case (Maney et al v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:48 am
Laura Howard, Haleigh Bennett, Jeff Brown, Lesia Dipman, and Linda Kidd (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA)) Native American Guardian's Association v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
” This continues the sordid state of affairs that existed prior to the pandemic, where hundreds of criminal cases were being dismissed annually for delay[9]. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Given his decision to refuse a faculty to remove all of the pews, the Chancellor stated that the Petitioners may wish to re-think their proposals in respect of the heating. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm
ShareWednesday’s oral argument in Coinbase v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In this regard, Jill Lepore’s fine discussion of Adkins should be compared to David Bernstein’s. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Brown, by Andrew CoanThe ongoing debate over the Dobbs majority’s attempt to claim the mantle of Brown v. [read post]
