Search for: "David N. v. Social Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
That’s a small n. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
First, the facts, as summarized in the Supreme Court's majority opinion (emphases added): "Through her business, 303 Creative LLC, Lorie Smith offers website and graphic design, marketing advice, and social media management services. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
Dávila v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
David v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
It includes provisions for digital verification services and the flow of personal data for law enforcement and national security purposes. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Pinedo, and David A. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Pinedo, and David A. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am
And finally…I Concerns were expressed at the timing of the Lionesses’ match in the Women’s World Cup final on Sunday vis-à-vis church services. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
On the cost side, the now-indispensable economics experts might charge, in a private case, millions and even tens of millions of dollars to define the relevant market, compute the “but for” price of the goods or services in question, prove the losses resulting from anticompetitive conduct, establish that common elements of proof will predominate over individual proof, and disprove the inevitable theoretical pro-competitive justifications for facially anticompetitive… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:31 am
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services , 2022 WL 1747863, at *15 (D.Me., 2022) David L. [read post]
