Search for: "Davis et al v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
As Thomas Piketty has shown, returns to capital and to labor have been heavily skewed toward capital in recent decades due largely to legal and economic frameworks.[23] With respect to politics, one often hears that business should remain “neutral. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Malik Al Nasir claims he has been pressed to remove a reference in his work to Antoinette Sandbach. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
Markus and Ji, Mason and Shao, Huijie, Surveying the Impact of China’s New (and Toothy) Data Privacy Laws on the WeChat Generation of Employees (ABA Criminal Justice Section Newsletter) ( 2023), University of Colorado School of Law Fagundes, Dave and Contreras, Jorge L., Private Ownership of Public Facts: Docudramas, Deals, and Life Story Rights (2023) UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming Yildirim, Emine Ozge and Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer and Lazarova, Ana and Vézina,… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Catherine Banet, et. al., eds., Resilience in Energy, Infrastructure, and Natural Resources Law: Examining Legal Pathways for Sustainability in Times of Disruption (2022). [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm
The case is Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
Davis L. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
City of New York (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting, joined by Gorsuch, J., and by Thomas, J., in part); Hawse v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
Expect Texas, et al., to really hone their State Farm arguments on remand. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 3:32 pm
The New York case is Freedom Holding Inc. et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Gateway Triangle Corp. et al. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Bell, et. al., Environmental Law Handbook (2019). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In an apparent attempt to reverse the rogue decision, the majority of active judges on the Ninth Circuit authorized en banc review.[3] But because the Ninth Circuit has so many judges, it alone among the federal appellate courts employs a limited en banc review, where only eleven of its active judges sit en banc, consisting of the chief judge and ten other active judges who are randomly selected.[4] Accordingly, limited en banc allows for “minority rule” in a subset of cases,[5]… [read post]
