Search for: "Davis v. Clear et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2024, 6:06 am
It is clear that OMA wants the public to believe the narrative that the institution was a victim to the directors scheming, but it is unbelievable that the museum’s internal power structuring allowed for the director to go unchecked, and to ‘silence’ those who voiced concerns.[13] Attorney Pierce O’Donnell, the aforementioned attorney who is a partial owner of the fakes, is a prominent LA litigator with a history of winning disputes of authenticity in court. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
”[7] By “traditional notions,” the Adopting Release refers to other SEC regulations and relevant Supreme Court case law (in particular, TSC Industries v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm
John Maloof v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 10:24 am
This brief supports the New Civil Liberties Alliance’s Powell, et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Shannon Creek et al, Case No. 4:23-cv-00325-O (N.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Shannon Creek et al, Case No. 4:23-cv-00325-O (N.D. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
It would provide investors with consistent, comparable, decision-useful information, and issuers with clear reporting requirements. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Circuit court decisions on ADA cases are sparse when compared to the number of suits filed, and cases involving self-service kiosks are rare, so it isn’t surprising the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Davis et al v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Circuit court decisions on ADA cases are sparse when compared to the number of suits filed, and cases involving self-service kiosks are rare, so it isn’t surprising the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Davis et al v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
1981 – Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom In 1967, homosexuality was in part decriminalised in England and Wales.[2] In 1980, it would be decriminalised under the same conditions in Scotland, and in 1982, in Northern Ireland as well. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Ulrich Kranz et al. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
”[10] The precise threshold for “excluding the possibility” is unclear, but some courts have said it does not require “definitive” exclusion, and that the defendant’s theory of the case should be credited,[11] though not accepted as truth when factual discrepancies are clear. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Supreme Court case Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Genomic Health, Inc., et al., Emmanuel Kei, et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Marigold et al v Wells (2023) UKUT 33 (LC) – Upper Tribunal on a reasonable excuse defence to a rent repayment order. [read post]
