Search for: "Davis v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 3,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
  No right to assisted dying under the ECHR In the case of Dániel Karsai v Hungary [2024] ECHR No. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:19 am by Frances Barker
Co-authored by Heidi Davis In a recent decision, the Labour Appeal Court (LAC), has clarified the jurisdiction of the Labour Court (the LC) in dealing with unlawful conduct during strikes. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
We therefore conclude that the Bureau’s funding mechanism does not violate the Appropriations Clause. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:56 am by Tobin Admin
Judge Brown reasoned that the Court of Appeals in Davis v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  But that does not mean that a statement given informally is not testimonial. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
Question 2: Does the public interest in debates about unlawful entry to the UK justify publishing unpixellated photos of children? [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
While "some overlap between the three separate branches does not violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers[,] . . . when [a branch] acts inconsistently with [the powers of another], or usurps its prerogatives, . . . the doctrine of separation is violated" (Clark v Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 189 [1985]).Defendant consists of 11 members who are nominated, subject to certain eligibility restrictions, by various members of the executive and legislative branches… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
While "some overlap between the three separate branches does not violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers[,] . . . when [a branch] acts inconsistently with [the powers of another], or usurps its prerogatives, . . . the doctrine of separation is violated" (Clark v Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 189 [1985]).Defendant consists of 11 members who are nominated, subject to certain eligibility restrictions, by various members of the executive and legislative branches… [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Second, the Act authorizes (but does not require) the President to seize any such assets within U.S. jurisdiction for the purpose of transferring those funds to the Ukraine Support Fund, which will be used to fund humanitarian efforts in Ukraine and Ukraine’s reconstruction and rebuilding efforts. [read post]