Search for: "Davis v. Hamilton"
Results 1 - 20
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Davis, and Helvering v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Davis (Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution) explore these issues and more. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
John Jay, the recipient of Hamilton’s letter, wrote of Virginia’s anti-assumption resolutions in his reply, ‘To treat them as very important might render them more so than I think they are. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Fritz wishes to provide no aid or comfort at all to ostensible disciples of Madison like Calhoun or Jefferson Davis. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
However, last week The Guardian reported that Judge Davis had sanctioned the news company for withholding records from the claimants until the eve of the trial. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Joseph Davies 28. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I think that Kenneth Stampp was basically correct many years ago when he said that, at least for historians, the legitimacy of secession remained an open—and perhaps unanswerable—question, a conclusion recently reaffirmed by Daniel Hamilton. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
Jan. 14, 2021) Hamilton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
Casto’s article “Dear Sister Antillico…”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina Khan was… [read post]
