Search for: "Davis v. Hudson" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation IPSO Resolution Statement – 00019-24 Peach v dorset.live, 7 children in sex cases (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00032-24 Hudson v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 20825-23 Revell v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina Khan was… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
We affirm the denial of Malloy‘s motion to suppress under the authority of Davis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by SHG
The “heavy costs” of suppressing the truth, id., should always be a court’s “last resort, not [its] first impulse,” Hudson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
ALBANY:   The Third Department heard oral argument and rendered a decision in Mid-Hudson Val. [read post]