Search for: "Davis v. Payne"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
From a two-Justice opinion in the Indiana Supreme Court case Payne-Elliott v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:01 pm
July 15, 2019) Payne v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm
Thomas Davis and Hera Arsen. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:20 pm
Payne (La. 2002); see also Davis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Matauszak, 415 Fed.Appx. 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (`[A] court cannot create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading’) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Payne v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
The Oklahoma courts reasoned (quite reasonably) that the Supreme Court’s decision in Payne v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Davis 15-424Issue: Whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:06 am
Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Timothy Davis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Ge v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:08 pm
In Phoenix Licensing v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:55 am
Juxtacomm-Texas Software, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
The New Republic also has a review of Norman Davies, Vanished Kingdoms: The Rise and Fall of States and Nations (Viking), which Jacob Soll describes as a "colossal wreck of a book. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
The Court Alexsam v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
My California-Davis colleague Andrea K. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 1:32 am
- Denver attorney Stan V. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Payne, No. 07-5592 In a conviction for multiple counts involving drugs, firearms, violence and multiple murders, court order authorizing involuntary medication treatment plan designed to restore defendant's competency to stand trial is affirmed over claims of error that the district court erred in finding that the evidence offered at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the proposed treatment is substantially likely to restore defendant's competency. [read post]
