Search for: "Dawkins v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Oct. 17, 2023) and Dawkins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
She came to this country as a teenage refugee from Vietnam and later served in the United States Army. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Dawkins & Ors. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
In MGN v United Kingdom, on balancing Article 8 and 10 rights, the Strasbourg Court stated (§142): The balancing of individual interests, which may well be contradictory, is a difficult matter and Contracting States must have a broad margin of appreciation in this respect since the national authorities are in principle better placed than this Court to assess whether or not there is a “pressing social need” capable of justifying an interference… [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:55 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full judgment in the libel case of McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors which was handed down on 30 March 2012 is now available ([2012] EWHC B3 (QB)). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
The United Kingdom – 31965/07 [2012] ECHR 261 (14 February 2012). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
In the United Kingdom the ultimate power supposedly lies with the Crown-in-Parliament. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
United States and asks whether “criminal law is a rigged game in which a crazed proceduralism is given more weight than the actual purpose of a criminal trial, which is to discover the truth about who committed a crime. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:18 pm
On July 21, 1925, in The State of Tennessee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
” And, sad to say for the professional Muslim-haters, the United States Government believes that Islam is a religion. [read post]
