Search for: "DeSimone v. State "
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2007, 8:38 pm
In Desimone v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:10 am
Regarding summary charts, the court looks to United States v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:02 pm
While there is no requirement that the trial court engage in any particular litany in order to satisfy itself that these standards have been met, a knowing and voluntary waiver cannot be inferred from a silent record as in People v DeSimone. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
In Desimone v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:05 am
The claims against DeSimone were dismissed two years ago (Stolarski v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:44 am
Desimone v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
The Supreme Court stated that this crime took place at the Linden Plaza apartment complex, and the individual was seen right where the event happened. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 5:38 am
Consistent with DeSimone, in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:31 pm
" The defendant further stated, in response to the Supreme Court's inquiry, that although he had previously been confined to a hospital for mental illness, he now felt well psychologically. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
IOP E(b); United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
IOP E(b); United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
Brooks v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am
“Where evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Boyer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:30 am
In 1871, geologist Ferdinand V. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:15 pm
The decision in EEOC v. [read post]