Search for: "Deal v. Commonwealth" Results 1 - 20 of 723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Glenn Neiman
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently addressed this issue in Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company v. [read post]
The full media release can be accessed here. 3             The Federal Court finds that a term in Auto & General Insurance Company’s contracts is not unfair On 22 March 2024, the Federal Court in ASIC v Auto & General Insurance Company limited [2024] FCA 272 handed down the first decision to apply the unfair contract terms (UCT) regime in the context of insurance since its expansion to insurance policies on 5… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
This is the second installment of a four-part series dealing with climate change in Colorado. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
There are no graves identified as war graves by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission [10]. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
The passengers (supported by the Commonwealth Attorney-General and ACCC, as interveners) took a different starting point — the threshold question is whether the forum law, as a matter of interpretation, applies to the contract irrespective of the parties’ usage of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:09 am by Christopher G. Hill
Of course, in the Commonwealth of Virginia where I practice law the contract is king and public policy generally has no bearing on the “deal” laid out in a contract. [read post]
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
S. 310 (1945) Because Pennsylvania is one of five states that currently requires all out-of-state businesses registering to do business in the State to consent to be sued in the state as a condition of registration, however, Mallory argued and the Supreme Court agreed in Mallory that Norfolk waived its ability to object to personal jurisdiction when it registered to do business in the Commonwealth. [read post]