Search for: "Deas v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
The notice states on page 13 that “DEA has not yet made a determination as to its views of the appropriate schedule for marijuana. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule V drugs are generally used for antidiarrheal, antitussive, and analgesic purposes. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
The Keep Your Opinions to Yourself Award: Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita The Failed Sunshine State Award: Florida Gov. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, SAMHSA issued exemptions to allow state regulatory authorities to request more flexible take-home restrictions. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:23 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is the issue in the 2009, San Antonio Court of Appeals opinion decided in Irwin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm by Kurt R. Karst
The state of current scientific knowledge regarding the drug. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 6:46 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  Instead, DEA states: This extension authorizes all DEA-registered practitioners to prescribe schedule II–V controlled medications via telemedicine through December 31, 2024, whether or not the patient and practitioner established a telemedicine relationship on or before November 11, 2023. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:42 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  (DEA initially placed Epidiolex in schedule V, then later decontrolled it). [read post]