Search for: "Denis v. Grounds" Results 1 - 20 of 18,164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Israel has denied that the IDF targets civilians, and it insists that it complies with the laws of war. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
  The “reasonable grounds” standard: For the ICC to issue an arrest warrant (or, where cooperation is anticipated, a summons to appear), the Prosecutor must convince a Pre-Trial Chamber that there are reasonable grounds to believe that crimes within the Court’s jurisdiction have been committed (article 58). [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]
15 May 2024, 11:00 pm
NO BASIS FOR INCREASE WAS PROFFEREDAfter mandatory arbitration in a small claims case, which alleged contract breach by the defendant, SS-F sought to increase the award in her favor from $500 to $5000.And after the Suffolk County District Court denied that request – on the grounds that “no timely demand for trial de novo” had been filed – SS-F appealed.On its review of the record, the Appellate Term, Second Department, noted that arbitration awards may only… [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
The publisher of the Daily Mail has “denied under oath” that it engaged in phone-hacking and other illegal newsgathering methods against Prince Harry and others. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These fair access requirements, first appearing in Florida’s House Bill 3 (2023) (“FL HB 3”), generally prohibit financial institutions from denying or canceling services to a person, or otherwise discriminating against a person in making available services, on the basis of enumerated factors, commonly including political opinions, religious beliefs, “social credit scores,” or any factor that is not “quantitative, impartial, and risk-based. [read post]