Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. B. P."
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal. 3d 341, 769 P.2d 399, 256 Cal. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation, supra, 3 Cal.5th at p. 504.) [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
APCC Services, Inc., 554 U.S. 269 (2008). 2136-37. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
Online 1 (2011); Gary Lawson & David B. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Thereafter, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, alleging that respondents' decision to terminate her was based upon her gender, in violation of the Human Rights Law, and, thus, arbitrary and contrary to law; petitioner further alleged that respondents failed to comply with the terms of 4 NYCRR 4.5 (b) (5) (iii) by not providing her with notice prior to termination. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Thereafter, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, alleging that respondents' decision to terminate her was based upon her gender, in violation of the Human Rights Law, and, thus, arbitrary and contrary to law; petitioner further alleged that respondents failed to comply with the terms of 4 NYCRR 4.5 (b) (5) (iii) by not providing her with notice prior to termination. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
In a footnote the court urged the Legislature to expeditiously amend Social Services Law § 384–b (8) to address the concerns it raised. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Bethel, 66 P.3d 840 (Kan. 2003). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
By Charlie B. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
