Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. N."
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Ezekiel Dixon-RomÁn and Dr. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Ezekiel Dixon-RomÁn and Dr. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The ALJ further determined that the Town's actions had been taken in retaliation for the complainant's litigation before the DHR. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The ALJ further determined that the Town's actions had been taken in retaliation for the complainant's litigation before the DHR. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Nevada Comm'n on Ethics v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
As claimant's contentions constitute a failure to hire claim, they are unavailing; Civil Service Law § 58 (1) (a) falls squarely within the law enforcement exception of the ADEA (see Feldman v Nassau County, 434 F3d at 184; Petrelli v City of Mount Vernon, 9 F3d 250, 253 [2nd Cir 1993]; Ruderman v Police Dept. of City of New York, 857 F Supp 326, 329 [SD NY 1994]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
As claimant's contentions constitute a failure to hire claim, they are unavailing; Civil Service Law § 58 (1) (a) falls squarely within the law enforcement exception of the ADEA (see Feldman v Nassau County, 434 F3d at 184; Petrelli v City of Mount Vernon, 9 F3d 250, 253 [2nd Cir 1993]; Ruderman v Police Dept. of City of New York, 857 F Supp 326, 329 [SD NY 1994]). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
And providing you with your own personal protection services is not law enforcement’s function. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
However, originalist approaches the Coinage Clause and the N&P Clause just validate the long-standing status quo. [read post]
3 May 2022, 12:06 pm
This notifies the IRS that the executor is responsible for the estate’s tax filings and the decedent’s final tax return(s).[60] Estate Tax. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
