Search for: "Diageo Americas Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog had an article on the recently discontinued representative claim SMO v TikTok Inc and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am by Barry Sookman
Amazon. com, Inc., 834 F. 3d 220 (2nd.Cir.2016) Norcia v Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC 845 F.3d 1279 (9th.Cir.2017) McMillan v Chaker 2017 WL 1336941 (S.D.Cal. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:24 am
Notwithstanding the fact that the Federal Court did not expressly lay down any limitation on the applicability of extended passing-off based on these two aspects, it is not straight-forward whether Malaysian courts will follow the approach taken by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in its recent decisions in the “VODKAT” case (Diageo North America Inc & Anor v Intercontinental Brands (ICB) Limited and Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 920) and the… [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:20 am by Jani Ihalainen
The current law was explained in Capitol Records, Inc v Naxos of America, Inc, where the Court of Appeals set out that "... [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by Ken White
Diageo Americas Supply, Inc., clarifying whether the Federal Clean Air Act preempts common law claims against an emitter, and whether that question is susceptible to interlocutory review? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:00 am by Diana A. Silva
Diageo Americas Supply, Inc., involved excess ethanol emissions from Johnny Walker and J&B brand whiskey distilleries located in Louisville, Kentucky that allegedly caused the growth of a specific type of mold on neighboring properties. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:47 am by Daniel Schwartz
Diageo North America, Inc., the Supreme Court recognized that the language of the CFEPA is plain and unambiguous (which normally ends a court’s inquiry into the meaning of a statute) in that nowhere does it establish protection for an individual who is regarded as having a physical disability. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  which causes actual damage to the business or goodwill of the trader bringing the action.In the recent ‘ Vodkat’ case, Diageo North America Inc v Intercontinental Brands (ICB) Ltd [2010] EWHC 17 (Ch), Arnold J held that "vodka" is a term that is capable of distinguishing a particular class and quality of product. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
Kurrus ("The plaintiff, Mireille Desrosiers, appeals from the partial summary judgment  rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants Diageo North America, Inc. [read post]