Search for: "Dill v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2012, 8:36 am by Arnstein & Lehr
Dill state that the opinion reminds employers to evaluate their policies and practices to ensure compliance with disability discrimination law. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm by Guest Author
Megan Dill is the Volume 31 Symposium Editor of the George Mason Law Review. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Despite the need for general guidance on the legal principles in play in determining whether something constitutes a “building”, the relevant test is that laid down in Skerritts of Nottingham v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and Regions [2000] JPL 1025 and as adopted in the Listed Buildings Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 10 March 2020, the Court will hear the appeal of Dill v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am by artatlawadmin
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides…Continue reading The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The Supreme… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am by artatlawadmin
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides… Read More »The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am by artatlawadmin
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides… Read More »The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am by artatlawadmin
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides…Continue reading The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The Supreme… [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 7:40 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
No. 041/2016 Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law New Memorandum Elaborates U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 9:59 am by Arnstein & Lehr
Dill state that “… the 8th Circuit affirmed its commitment to the ‘honest belief rule,’ which allows an employer to rely on its findings following an investigation to make an adverse employment decision against an employee. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]