Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
” The article referred to a £5,000 fine imposed by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in 2010. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am by Bernard Bell
EOIR’s Disciplinary Counsel is assisted by one attorney (an Assistant Disciplinary Counsel) and one investigator. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Trial counsel did submit 14 mitigating factors and called numerous other witnesses. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In McKinney v Bennett, 31 AD3d 860, the Appellate Division held that the appointing authority was not required to read all 1,228 pages of the hearing transcript and each document submitted, citing Matter of Taub v Pirnie, 3 NY2d 188. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In McKinney v Bennett, 31 AD3d 860, the Appellate Division held that the appointing authority was not required to read all 1,228 pages of the hearing transcript and each document submitted, citing Matter of Taub v Pirnie, 3 NY2d 188. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
The question involves whether the agency’s determination constitutes “final agency action” under Bennett v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
(Photo by Bruce Bennett Studios/Getty Images) From Allianz Suisse Versicherungs-Gesellschaft v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
   Talk about opening the floodgates of litigation… The floodgates of opinions down in Columbus remained firmly shut; nothing but Case Announcements, such as one denying a motion to supplement the record, or terminating probation in a disciplinary case, or — and here’s a biggie — ordering counsel to “redact personal identifiers contained in the  attachments to relator’s motion to hold respondent in contempt. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:09 am
An employee’s suspension without pay may extended if the delay in an administrative disciplinary action is caused by the accusedMatter of Skrypek v Bennett, 31 AD3d 827, reversed, 7 NY3d 919May an employee, in the course of a disciplinary hearing, be removed from the payroll after he or she has already been suspended without pay for up to the thirty days authorized by Section 75 of the Civil Service Law? [read post]