Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Connors"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
From Judge Reed O'Connor's order today in Doe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:50 am
Further, plaintiff fails to allege that, but for defendants’ alleged negligence, she would have accepted the settlement offer and would not have sustained any damages (see Magnacoustics, Inc. v Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, 303 AD2d 561, 562 [2d Dept 2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 511 [2003]; Cannistra v O’Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle, Oleson & Collins, 286 AD2d 314, 316 [2d Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 611 [2002]). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
Freer v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
Arguing Counsel Anthony T. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:56 am
D.W. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Counsel Comments provided by: Geoff Hope and Dana Adams, Counsel for the Appellant/Respondent on Cross Appeal, Edmonton Police Service (City of Edmonton) “This is a decision dealing with the Edmonton Police Service’s right, as an employer, to restrict its officers from occupying positions where they might have to testify in court on the basis that their past disciplinary history could harm the credibility of their testimony. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am
When appellate counsel also served as trial counsel and moves to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
”) At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Joseph M. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
” Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for Petitioners. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:49 am
He relied on the separate opinions of Justices O’Connor and Ginsburg in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:28 am
If you’ve ever debated the wisdom of doing the horizontal mambo with a client, you might want to check out the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
’” Despite the vagueness of the case law, defense counsel should not ignore these elements in jury instructions. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
Ruth V. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:44 am
Vince is asking the court to stay the entire time, while Disciplinary Counsel is asking that the entire time be an actual suspension. [read post]
