Search for: "District of Columbia v. Royal" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
Canada On 31 October 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia handed down judgement in favour of the defendants in the case of Seyedalikhani v Mansouri, 2023 BCSC 1902. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Indeed, this bias from inadequate control of confounding infects several pending pharmaceutical multi-district litigations. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:00 am by Geraldine Davila Gonzalez
United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court (July 2008) On June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
District Court for the District of Columbia over allegations of torture, detention and extrajudicial killing. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that this “is the case gun-rights advocates have been waiting for since 2008, when the Supreme Court first recognised an individual right to own a gun for self-defence” in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the District of Columbia rejected a request from the House Judiciary Committee to have the same judge rule in a case involving former White House counsel Don McGahn and another involving grand jury material relating to former special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, according to the Hill. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Canada (Attorney General) in 1993, and Sauvé v. [read post]
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., which discussed in depth whether the Alien Torts Statute applied extraterritorially [Multinational Companies Kiobel Brief]. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Later decisions in the Courts of Appeals for the Seventh, Ninth, and District of Columbia Circuits agreed with Judge Leval and held that corporations can be subject to suit under the ATS. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
The most recent unsolicited solicitor-general amicus brief was filed in Royal v. [read post]