Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 1 - 20
of 12,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
More importantly, Part III is persuasive and does pretty much what I predicted it would. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
In 1776, under Joseph II, a decree was issued requiring all antique coins to be deposited in the Imperial Numismatic Cabinet. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
—a bit similar to Nigeria in terms of federalism—does not do that either. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
“Where does it end? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
Part II is a very useful summary of standing doctrine. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:43 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh joined I, II, and IV, and Justice Barrett joined Parts I, II-A, and II-B. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:39 pm
This ruling, which affirmed the Court of Appeal ruling in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
In Maxell, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am
Some nine years ago I wrote about an LLC dissolution case titled Goldstein v Pikus decided by former Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Charles Ramos which also involved a bitter dispute between two estranged co-managing members of a realty-holding LLC. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 1:37 pm
In Davidson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
For example, the court in a case known as R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC), noted that “carrying does not require personal possession”. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm
[ii] While the Supreme Court could always overrule itself, under present law, we think that the MQD does not apply to the FTC’s trade rule authority and, even if it did, that Congress clearly authorized the rule in the FTC Act as amended. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Under this approach, Gibbons v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
Part I of the paper presents Justice Lewis Powell's famous attack on presumed damages in Gertz v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Part I discusses interpretive and analytical tools from constitutional law and social science that Parts II and III use. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
I. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
I. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
Indeed, it is built on four major axes: i) tackling discrimination against LGBTIQ people; ii) ensuring LGBTIQ people’s safety; iii) building LGBTIQ inclusive societies; iv) leading the call for LGBTIQ equality around the world. [read post]
