Search for: "Doe IIIĀ " Results 1 - 20 of 18,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:49 am by Ezequiel Heffes
However, the idea that areas under the control of armed groups are solely characterized by chaos and disorder does not accurately depict empirical reality. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by David Lynn
However, the Court also ruled that the SEC lacked rulemaking authority under Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act because (i) the SEC failed to define the “fraud” it was seeking to prevent and there were an insufficient number of enforcement actions to support the necessity of the rulemaking, (ii) Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act does not permit rulemaking concerning disclosures or reporting, (iii) Section 206(4) does not authorize the SEC to issue rulemakings… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:47 am by David Klein
If the plaintiff fails to satisfy even one of the Rule 23(a) factors, the presiding court does not need to proceed to Rule 23(b). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm by Guest Author
Another Look at the Plain Language and Legislative History[iii] Some of the anonymous volunteers, perhaps aware that the question of the FTC’s rulemaking authority is not novel, instead opined that the FTC lacks the authority to write substantive rules governing unfair competition. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Part III presents a series of challenges to the basic account, and, in response to those challenges, Part IV counterposes a different, and markedly narrower theory based on what I call the "restricted ideational conception of reputational injury. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
Part I discusses interpretive and analytical tools from constitutional law and social science that Parts II and III use. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
Yet, Bulgarian authorities refused to issue a passport/ID for S.D.K.A since Bulgarian law does not recognise same-sex parenthood. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
It does not matter whether the privileged words used are defamatory or not, they simply cannot be used to ground a claim (except by way of providing context to other words or where an exception e.g. malice, applies); and the privilege operates to limit what the claimant can rely upon. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am by Daniele Durkin
  The creators of this genAI technology were also included as John Doe defendants in the suit. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:16 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
“Biometric data” does not include the following unless the biometric data is used for identification purposes: (i) a digital or physical photograph; (ii) an audio or voice recording; or (iii) any data generated from a digital or physical photograph or an audio or video recording. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
On November 27, 2023, the examiner issued a decision rejecting the requested trade mark under Article 7(1)(e)(iii) and Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the EUTMR essentially on the basis that:a) the mark is simply a combination of presentation features, with an upper view shape and a realistic flat lower surface with feathers, eyes, and beams, which consumers would perceive as typical of the products in question; b) the shape does not significantly differ from… [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
This could be done by providing evidence that the practice: (i) does not materially degrade or threaten to materially degrade the BIAS of the general public; (ii) does not hinder consumer choice; (iii) does not impair competition, innovation, consumer demands, or investment; and (iv) does not impede any forms of expression, types of service, or points of view. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Part III takes this understanding of constitutional essentials beyond the debates canvassed in Constitutional Essentials. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Part III introduces the third grouping of reforms about litigation in the lower courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 10:14 am by Eleonora Rosati
Such a mandate is not limited to Article 7(1)(f): it applies to all absolute grounds for refusal/invalidity.In what follows it is detailed – in brief – how the Grand Board came to the conclusion that no registration should be granted.Contrariety to public policy and accepted principles of moralityContrariety to Article 7(1)(f) was found to subsist because, in essence, ‘COVIDIOT’ is a word that, while it serves to indicate in a derogatory fashion a person or a group of person… [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 4:47 am by Rose Hughes
Preclinical and/or in vitro data may be sufficient to render a treatment claim credible (T 0966/18, IPKat), whereas a phase III clinical trial is usually needed for regulatory approval of a drug. [read post]