Search for: "Doe v. Ainsworth"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am
Application of the Moçambique principle follows the Supreme Court decision in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth ([2011] UKSC 39) and its application in Chugai v UCB ([2017] EWHC 1216 (Pat)). [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The UK courts have grappled with this definition before, most notably in the case of George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd (helpfully summarized here), which has been interpreted further in Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The UK courts have grappled with this definition before, most notably in the case of George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd (helpfully summarized here), which has been interpreted further in Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
Ainsworth, 2017 UT 60, ¶ 13, 423 P.3d 1229 (―We review the court of appeals‘ decision for correctness, without according any deference to its analysis.‖). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:51 am
Does it mean that since an intangible thing is not in action, it may not be a property at all? [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
The event blurb reads:"Jurisdictional issues have increasingly come to the fore in IP disputes in recent years, from Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and Actavis v Eli Lilly to FRAND disputes such as Unwired Planet v Huawei, Apple v Qualcommand Conversant v Huawei & ZTE, as parties clash on forum-shopping and attempts to reach one-stop resolution of their IP disputes. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Ainsworth, 22 Barb. 118 (1856). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
In Simien v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
Also it is important to point out that Star Wars, or more specifically a storm trooper helmet, was the key point of contention in the regularly cited case of Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth (2011). [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Doe, 915 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Tex. 1995). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Under Edwards v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am
Occasionally there are cases that seem to be tailor-made for legal geeks: Naruto v Slater; Lucasfilm v Ainsworth; DC Comics v Towle. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
"Varsity Brands, Inc., et al V Star Athletica, LLC. (14-5237)http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/08/19/copyright-case-asks-what-is-a-cheerleading-uniform/ [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
See Witkoff v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
Ainsworth v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
The proposition being debated was whether in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and the ongoing Actavis v Eli Lilly case we were seeing a Dutch-style territorial grab for jurisdiction or that in the words of one clever barrister a "phantom menace"? [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
For example, in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 the Supreme Court held that acts of copyright infringement in a non-EU country under foreign copyrights can be determined by the English courts. [read post]
