Search for: "Doe v. Bruno" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 3:55 am
Claiming drug abuse as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities ActD’Amico v Bruno, CA2, 132 F.3d 145Vito D’Amico, a New York City firefighter, complained that the Department violated the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (an anti-discrimination law that applies to federally-funded employers) when it dismissed him from his position with the Fire Department of the City of New York (NYFD) because of his use of illegal drugs. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:57 pm
The much-awaited New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in Baxter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:11 am
Peculiar does not mean that the risk must be one which is abnormal to the type of work done, or that it must be an abnormally great risk, but instead refers to a special recognizable danger arising out of the work itself. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 12:09 pm by Steven Cohen
  Bruno does not claim that he followed NFPA 921 in his investigation of the fire, thus that cannot serve as a basis for exclusion. [read post]
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]