Search for: "Doe v. Doe, No. 125" Results 1 - 20 of 1,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 4:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
In other words, while the reputation of the trademark applied for does not have an impact on the overall appreciation of likelihood of confusion, it does matter for the comparison of the signs. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartz v Oshman & Mirisola, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31592(U) May 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155780/2023 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And it is incumbent on each of us to make sure it does not come to pass and that investors are not harmed by noncompliance with the securities laws when it comes to this new technology. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The rules will become effective 125 days after publication in the Federal Register. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Orbis relied on Warby J’s (as he then was) observations in Rudd v Bridle [2019] EWHC 893 (QB) and Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 3541 (QB) in this regard. [read post]