Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
At the same time, those conversations can feel coercive to private sector entities because the government has a myriad of regulatory powers over the private sector, and every government communication necessarily carries an implied threat that non-compliance could trigger some negative consequence. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:34 am
But not this case.The post What Does <i>Murthy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:18 am
According to the government, interested entities have until the end of September 2024 to submit PDIL and PDP project proposals. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Other courts hold that the ADA does apply to former employees. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:20 am
The post City of Aspen v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
Whether a governmental defendant has waived its sovereign immunity is a threshold issue. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:01 am
In 1963, the Court held in Bantam Books v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 11:44 am
v=PmSDoty1gtg&feature=youtu.be [2] United Nations. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 11:44 am
v=PmSDoty1gtg&feature=youtu.be [2] United Nations. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:51 am
The conversation probed the possibilities for these legal principles to hold governmental entities accountable and protect our shared ecological resources for future generations. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In-scope financial institutions (and, in some cases, entities applying for the relevant licenses or the QPD designation) are required to provide attestations regarding their compliance with FL HB 3’s fair access provisions, under the penalty of perjury and in accordance with the timeline in the relevant statutes.[7] For example, FL HB 3 requires “financial institutions subject to the financial institutions codes” to attest whether they are acting in compliance with… [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Likewise, the characterization of cannabis as a health hazard does not mean that it is, in fact, dangerous or that is does not offer significant medicinal benefits. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
From Pryor v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
This year, bills were offered to extend the sovereign caps to companies that were not in privity of contract with the governmental entities. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
Most recently, our Supreme Court held "Article I, Section 1 also applies when a governmental entity acts in an arbitrary and capricious manner toward one of its employees. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
(That’s what Dean Martinez was getting at when she observed, in her public explanation of SLS’s policies, that “the First Amendment does not give protestors a ‘heckler’s veto. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
The Supreme Court decision is Sheetz v. [read post]