Search for: "Doe v. Flowers"
Results 1 - 20
of 558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
In Bissonnette v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
” What does that mean? [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
They got into a dispute with Flowers Foods, who make the baked goods for delivery. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
I was delighted to have been invited to participate in the Asser Institute: Center for International and European Law & University of Amsterdam Law School-[Spring Academy] Technologies of sustainability due diligence: Digital tools and global value chain regulations which takes place in The Hague, Netherlands from 8-12 April 2024. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:49 am
The case is entitled Ash v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
In June 2023, in 303 Creative v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:50 am
ShareBissonnette v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Letting 1,000 flowers bloom on the fifty State Supreme Courts, as to presidential eligibility requirements, is more likely to produce a weed garden than it is the Rose Garden.The post Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:56 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
Canales v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
The case of McIntyre v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
” Flowers Foods had argued that there is no split in the circuits, that the Supreme Court in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
