Search for: "Doe v. Hunter" Results 1 - 20 of 797
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
For example, the court in a case known as R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC), noted that “carrying does not require personal possession”. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
This section does NOT authorize the appointing of private citizen Jack Smith to be an inferior officer Special Counsel. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, contrary to the Second Circuit, has held that “Item 303 does not create a duty to disclose for purposes of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” In reality, Rule 1.8.5(a) does state the general bar on such payments. [read post]