Search for: "Doe v. Parson"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The proposed law enforcement Codes of Conduct do not have to involve any data protection expertise, nor the ICO, nor does the text require Parliamentary approval nor does a Code have to consider its impact on data subjects. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The court also handed down a restraining order for the victims and a sexual harm prevention order banning him from approaching women he does not know in public for 15 years. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The Open Rights Group have published a report which reveals that the data of individuals referred to the counter-terrorism Prevent programme is widely shared – with airports, ports and immigration services – and retained for years, even when a case does not meet the threshold for further investigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
On Tuesday 22 January 2024, there will be a pre-trial review in Parsons v Atkinson QB-2021-004305. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm
Mike Parson signed the law at the center of the case, known as the Second Amendment Preservation Act, in 2021. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 12:15 am
Parsons Jr. and Joseph R. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
I was delighted to be given an opportunity to address the participants in the Workshop-Conference: Technological Platforms and National Security in Hong Kong: The Domain of Standards Setting, sponsored by the Law and Technology Center and the Philip K.H. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Donelan failed to give the number; this blog does. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
Surreptitious surveillance does not meet the ‘one or more persons present’ standard (see: R v Sloan, 1994 CanLII 1921 (ONCA). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:14 pm
, Parson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
So where does this tendency come from? [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
" Parson, 352 F. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:04 am
The Sixth Circuit decided the case of Arocho v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 5:53 am
See Parson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 11:10 am
Granite Telecommunications, LLC, and Parson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 5:19 am
Parsons v. [read post]
