Search for: "Doe v. Phillips" Results 1 - 20 of 1,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 5:42 am by Eric Goldman
Phillips also argued that the unilateral amendment right made the contract illusory, an argument that succeeded in the Harris v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These are not secret analyses; they are public documents for the whole world to see.[4] Even parties that argue in court that their conduct does not implicate the federal securities laws have themselves used the Howey framework internally for years to evaluate crypto offerings.[5] Of course, that doesn’t mean that all crypto products are offered as “investment contracts” and are therefore securities. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that plaintiff has a case against Barton under the New York City Human Rights Law.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The first and most obvious problem with the Bill is that it does nothing to address the most common scenarios and concerns in SLAPP cases. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
This is probably a case where the PTAB’s move to the Phillips v. [read post]