Search for: "Doe v. The Federal Republic of Germany et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
Federal Republic of Germany exhibits "the same bare syllogistic reasoning" (Lord Hoffmann) found also in the ECHR's minority opinion in Al-Adsani. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Federal Republic of Germany, et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Drone Strikes in Yemen (Faisal bin Ali Jaber et al v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:32 pm
Helpful Links Kinsley, et al., v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:00 pm
(Racial Profiling in Germany )The excellent symposium essays seek to translate the practices at issue in Basu v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, and the Federal Insurance Co. et. al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] – Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
”[22] Now what does all this have to do with what might seem an ordinary case of federal securities law, raising what might seem a less foundational question of whether hedge fund managers have a right to a jury trial in federal court rather than having their securities fraud cases heard by an ALJ? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am
(TorrentFreak) European Commission publishes Memorandum of Understanding on the sale of counterfeit goods over the internet (jiplp) Finland Pirate Bay user heavily fined for sharing single album (TorrentFreak) Germany German court orders Samsung to remove Galaxy Tab 7.7″ from IFA (trade show) booth and German website (FOSS Patents) Federal Court of Justice on whether the subject matter is considered a technical invention: Webseitenanzeige (Kluwer Patent Blog)… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
The Right to Arms, Militias, and Slavery in the Early Republic and Antebellum PeriodsChapter 6. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
In Park County Environmental Council v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm
The Court argued in Italy v Council that even the fact that the act in question was voted for in the Council by the representative of a Member State does not hinder its application for annulment (see also: Lenaerts et al., EU Procedural Law (para. 7.77)). [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Powerscreen International Distribution Limited et al. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims… [read post]
