Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 1 - 20 of 4,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 4:48 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
Article 25 of the Brussels Ia Regulation does not expressly address the effect of choice of court agreements on third parties. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
There were 20 other adults; 15 men and 5 women, as well as 1 child. [read post]
21 May 2024, 10:46 am by bklemm@foley.com
  The Notice does so by providing a new safe harbor that taxpayers may use to calculate the inputs for satisfying the Manufactured Products Requirement for solar, wind, and storage projects (the “New Elective Safe Harbor”). [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Among other requirements,[1] FL HB 3 imposes fair access requirements on certain financial institutions. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am by Russell Knight
” (Emphases added.) 750 ILCS 5/501(c-1)(3)(emphasis provided) Interim attorney’s fees should be liberally granted. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:23 am by bklemm@foley.com
Notably, while the Final Rule sets an $8 amount for late fees, it does not set the amount for the wider category of penalty fees, for which Larger Card Issuers may still use adjusted threshold amounts. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:04 pm by Béligh Elbalti
In addition, Article 1(1) of Federal Legislative Decree No. 41/2022 states that “The provisions of the present Legislative Decree shall apply to non-Muslim citizens of the UAE and to foreign non-Muslims residing in the UAE, unless they invoke the application of their own law in matters of marriage, divorce, succession, wills and establishment of filiation. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
While Hong Kong’s ratification to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) occurred in 1976 during the colonial era as the United Kingdom’s ratification was extended to the then dependent territory, Annex I, Section XIV of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and Article 39 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law legally guarantee that the ICCPR remains in force in Hong Kong since the end of the colonial era on 1 July 1997. [read post]