Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 1 - 20 of 2,138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Alexandre Skander Galand
” In my view, this case law, which is surveyed in the next section, does not suggest that a new notification is needed if the situation is effectively a continuation of the original one. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Qualified privilege under the 1996 Act  The relevant parts of the 1996 Act are as follows: “15 Reports, &c. protected by qualified privilege. (1)  The publication of any report or other statement mentioned in Schedule 1 to this Act is privileged unless the publication is shown to be made with malice, subject as follows. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
What powers does the European Parliament have? [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 152332/22 Appeal No. 2379 Case No. 2022-05305 [*1]In the Matter of Yonathan Bonifacio, Petitioner-Appellant, v Keechant Sewell et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 152332/22 Appeal No. 2379 Case No. 2022-05305 [*1]In the Matter of Yonathan Bonifacio, Petitioner-Appellant, v Keechant Sewell et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[13] The scope of the incident response program covers all customer information and is intentionally broader than that of the notification requirement, which only covers “sensitive customer information,” as discussed below.[14] 1. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “In the instant action, plaintiff alleges that defendants committed malpractice in failing to oppose PLIVA’s summary judgment motion (NYSCEF doc. no. 1 at ¶ 47, 51, 86, 96, and 124) and to timely file a motion to vacate (id. at ¶ 42, 48, 87, 97, 125). [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Home Health Care Services—Spine Injury—Applicant, 76 years old, suffered an industrial lumbar spine injury on 6/17/96. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
Since the Romanian Government does not give any reason why recognition should not be granted, there should be no obstacle to automatic recognition. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
The commission finds that the Department does not have the legal authority to charge a penalty on fraudulently obtained LWA benefits. [read post]