Search for: "Does 1-99"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 9:44 am
§736.1502(2), a CPT must be created after July 1, 2021. [read post]
25 May 2024, 8:05 am
But in Florida, pure comparative fault meant that even if the plaintiff was 99% at-fault for their own injuries, that did not absolve the other party from their 1% of damages. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
., ¶ 99), and Nationstar, later known as Mr. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
As neither House of Parliament has raised an objection by 17 May 2024,[1] the way seems to be paved for the Government’s ambitious plans to have the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention[2] implemented and ratified by the end of June 2024.[3] For the first time since the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (so-called Brexit) on 31 January 2020, a general multilateral instrument would thus once again be put in place to govern the mutual recognition and enforcement of… [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:13 am
That meant that even if you were 99% at fault for the injury you sustained, you could still pursue legal action against the other person for their 1% of fault. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:43 am
At the end of the process then, it may be possible for you to be held 99% at fault and the other party only 1% at fault. [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
While Hong Kong’s ratification to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) occurred in 1976 during the colonial era as the United Kingdom’s ratification was extended to the then dependent territory, Annex I, Section XIV of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and Article 39 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law legally guarantee that the ICCPR remains in force in Hong Kong since the end of the colonial era on 1 July 1997. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Seventh Circuit further commented that although Rule 23(e) does not require judicial approval to settle or dismiss cases brought as class actions, yet not so certified — an issue it invited the rules committee of the Judicial Conference to consider — through its mandate in §78u–4(c)(1), the PSLRA supplies a mechanism for review of the underlying merit of a supplemental disclosure case and mootness fees. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:03 am
” “Based on the foregoing, Supreme Court providently denied leave to renew based on the allegations in plaintiffs’ December 19, 2022 amended legal malpractice complaint against its counsel in the overcharge proceeding, as there was no need to resort to extrinsic evidence in interpreting the unambiguous terms of the various agreements (see Ashwood Capital, Inc. v OTG Mgt., Inc., 99 AD3d 1, 7-8 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
Richard Tromans 1:57 Yeah. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
The Regulation refers to packaging “placed on the market” in various provisions (most notably Art. 4(1)) and recitals (e.g. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
Case Commented On: KMN v SZM, 2024 BCCA 70 (CanLII), overturning 2023 BCSC 940 (CanLII) We have both written previously on myths and stereotypes about intimate partner violence (IPV), one of the most common of which is that women make false or exaggerated claims of violence to gain an advantage in family law disputes (see here and here). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:43 pm
If this does not occur, an essential element of the offence will not be made out. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
1. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:51 am
Q-1. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
So, here is judgment number 1. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
It does not have a right to federal funding. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am
Readers who are perplexed about the relevance of the furry creature in the above image might like to read Wombles Ltd v Wombles Skips Ltd [1977] RPC 99.Details:Published: 2024Format: Hardback, EbookExtent: 702 pagesISBN: 978 1 80392 522 6Imprint: Edward Elgar Publishing [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
This means that if you’ve been arrested for a DUI, there is about a 99% chance that you will, in fact, go through the whole court process, including the mandatory alcohol screening. [read post]
