Search for: "Does I through Doe III" Results 1 - 20 of 6,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 2:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Article III does not allow a plaintiff to seek to vindicate someone else's injuries. . . . [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Consider as an example a landlord who does not uphold her responsibility to ensure that a rental unit meets a reasonable standard for a safe, healthy home. [read post]
Employers will be able to discharge liability for AI-powered discriminatory decisions, if they can show they (i) did not create or modify the AI system; (ii) audited the AI system for discrimination at each stage; and (iii) put procedural safeguards in place to remove the risk of discrimination. 3. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:49 am by Ezequiel Heffes
However, the idea that areas under the control of armed groups are solely characterized by chaos and disorder does not accurately depict empirical reality. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
Part I discusses interpretive and analytical tools from constitutional law and social science that Parts II and III use. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
Indeed, it is built on four major axes: i) tackling discrimination against LGBTIQ people; ii) ensuring LGBTIQ people’s safety; iii) building LGBTIQ inclusive societies; iv) leading the call for LGBTIQ equality around the world. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
… Schedule 1 Qualified Privilege Part I Statements having qualified privilege without explanation or contradiction A fair and accurate report of proceedings in public before a court anywhere in the world. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am by Daniele Durkin
  The creators of this genAI technology were also included as John Doe defendants in the suit. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
This could be done by providing evidence that the practice: (i) does not materially degrade or threaten to materially degrade the BIAS of the general public; (ii) does not hinder consumer choice; (iii) does not impair competition, innovation, consumer demands, or investment; and (iv) does not impede any forms of expression, types of service, or points of view. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Part III introduces the third grouping of reforms about litigation in the lower courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 10:14 am by Eleonora Rosati
That perception will prevent any possibility of perception of the trade mark as an indication of a specific industrial or commercial origin of the goodsThere are some instances in which Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR does play a relevant role, a recent example being ‘PABLO ESCOBAR’, but more often than not it is a ground that adds undue complexity to trade mark examinations.Having said that, the decision provides helpful guidance on the construction and application of the principles set… [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
Notably, the Prosecutor’s statement itself does not mention belligerent occupation. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
At the root of the problem lies this simple observation: the current regulatory framework for our securities and commodities market structure simply was not designed for and does not work for digital assets. [read post]