Search for: "Does v. Barry" Results 1 - 20 of 868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
Download.aspx (delaware.gov) Claim limitation that patent applicant added to avoid examiner’s rejection made a “material” change, barring use of earlier application to set patent’s priority date. 23-1147.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322401.pdf (uscourts.gov) Part owner of trademark owner lacked right to sue to cancel similar trademarks. 23-1383.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322382.pdf (uscourts.gov) Federal Trade Commission sues Live Nation for monopolization and unlawful exclusive… [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
However, the error does not affect the overall conclusion that the appellant did not meet his onus to show there are grounds to believe that the defence had no prospect of success. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Barry Cushman, The Secret Lives of the Four Horsemen, 83 Va. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The assumption seems reasonable given that PitchBook does not report race. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Recognizing that corporate actors exercise power and must act within the rule of law does not mean such actors may completely supplant the state. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 8:31 am by Barry Sookman
…The post Internet account holders not liable for copyright infringement: Voltage v Doe appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]