Search for: "Douglas v. Herring et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
TopVerdict Names $10.1M and $2.85M Verdicts to Top Labor & Employment Verdicts in California in 2023
11 Jun 2024, 12:06 pm
City of Riverside, et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 20810/19 Appeal No. 2334 Case No. 2023-04532 [*1]Krystal Campbell, Appellant, v The City of New York, Respondent, Deputy Warden of Corrections Sherrie Remburt, et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 20810/19 Appeal No. 2334 Case No. 2023-04532 [*1]Krystal Campbell, Appellant, v The City of New York, Respondent, Deputy Warden of Corrections Sherrie Remburt, et al. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
As her 97 page decision evinces, Judge Rosenstengel conducted four days of hearings, which included viva voce testimony from Martin Wells, and she obviously read the underlying papers, reviews, as well as the briefs and the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, with great care. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:23 am
In Glick, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
The jury found in favour of Ms Heard in respect of one of the three statements complained of in her counterclaim. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Vincent’s Home, Inc., WDM Health Services, et al., 2022 IL App (4th) 210458, Jan. 28, 2022. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLC, et al., 2021 IL App (1st) 210526 (Nov. 16, 2021). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Advocate Health and Hospitals, et al., 2020 IL App (1st) 191638-U (Oct. 21, 2020). [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Advocacy A lawyer’s role is to pursue her client’s interests within the bounds of legality. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:47 am
Experian Holdings, Inc., et al. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Bowser, et al. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
All of this is to say: now more than ever, there is regulatory appetite and political will in Australia to hold Facebook et al accountable. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Bednarski, et al., No. 43-CV-2016-900204.00 (Ala. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The Cotton v Berry case provoked criticism about judicial competence for handling cases involving family violence, particularly coercive control. [read post]
