Search for: "Du. S. v. Bright"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
From last week’s relists, Blankenship v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
And will the antitrust agencies develop any bright-line rules, similar to merger presumptions, to evaluate these transactions? [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Trust Général du Canada, [2001] 3 RCS 882, 2001 CSC 87 [25] Par ailleurs, au sens strict du terme, le concept de solidarité passive ne s’applique pas. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 1:18 am
While Miramax v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
From Wang’s lawyer’s perspective, the call resulted in “retention. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am
Just like it is the case with the EP´s proposal, the 2nd revised UN draft Treaty (dated 6th August 2020) (for comments on the applicable law aspects of the 1st revised draft, see Claire Bright´s note for the BIICL here) contains provisions on international jurisdiction (Article 9, “Adjudicative Jurisdiction”) and choice of law (Article 11, “Applicable law”). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
Borel v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Whether a particular warning should have been in a different location, in pictures, in bright red, or in a different language frankly doesn’t matter nearly as much when the warning’s intended recipient is a prescribing physician. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Our previews of the Illinois Supreme Court's September docket continue with Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
Gopika Murthy, to present a refreshing outlook on the copyright infringement and issues over terms of service relating to social media, as were highlighted in Agence France Presse v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Private legal transplant appears, therefore, characterized by a bright and a dark side. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
A further reflection of Chris's current interest in China can be viewed here, in this link to an IP Brief feature on the refusal by the Chinese to allow the registration of FRACOGNAC as a trade mark for alcoholic drinks other than beer (Class 33), following some doughty opposition by the Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:28 pm
Superdry is the casual-wear label du jour. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
For the cert petition and the assorted amicus briefs filed in this case, including the one by the Solicitor General/SEC, go to the DU Corporate Governance web site. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
In Bright v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
E.I. du Pont de Nemours, 768 N.W.2d 674 (Wis. 2009) (Prosser, Gableman, & Ziegler, JJ., concurring).We didn’t know squat about the state of play in Wisconsin, and our reader didn’t know what was going on in Pennsylvania. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Siracusano v. [read post]
