Search for: "Dykes v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
The United Nations Human Rights Committee has expressed serious concerns about HK’s ‘seditious intention’ offences [paras 15,16]. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Dykes v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Daniels of the United States District Court (SDNY), and Joel R. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
United Parcel Service Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
Cayetano and Hawai'i v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
Van Dyke, 643 F. 2d 992, 993-994 (CA4 1981); United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am
And the United States has a peculiar way of weathering the worst of times and coming out stronger. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:51 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a major decision interpreting provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA), specifically the AIA on-sale bar provisions. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm
The band attempted to register its name as a trademark but United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) refused the registration. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:14 am
The day before the Court released its 1919 opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:23 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, decided SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
