Search for: "E.E., a child v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2022, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
” In E.S. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
Whether one agrees or not with the analysis of the ECtHR in either case, both might be helpful when it comes to interpreting public policy/morality exclusions in IP law, especially with regard to trade mark applications and copyright enforcement.With regard to trade marks, the test advanced by the ECThR in E.S. v Austria appears in line with the one that the Appointed Person has suggested for UK trade mark applications. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
That's part of a broader doctrine under which European countries are still allowed to punish blasphemy.The case, decided yesterday by the European Court of Human Rights, is E.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Frank R. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:19 am
Eubanks wanted E.E. and P.E. to be raised and educated in the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 2:01 pm
He refers to the decisions in Anderson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
The recent published decision of E.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
The recent published decision of E.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:12 pm
On August 15, 2017, the New Jersey Appellate Division approved for publication the decision in the matter of E.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:08 am
See E.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
It is well settled that the paramount concern in a custody proceeding arising out of a parental dispute is "the best interest of the child[ren], and what will best promote the child[ren's] welfare and happiness" (Eschbach v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:18 am
(citing Darin v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:49 am
In Ermini v Vittori, 2013 WL 1703590 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:22 am
” See E.E. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
The Court pointed out that in True v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
The Court pointed out that in True v. [read post]
