Search for: "E.F.1" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
  In partly holding for the defendants, the opinion ignores well established doctrine that interprets “investment contract”[1] and is inconsistent in its treatment of ordinary investors’ expectations as distinct from the expectations of sophisticated investors. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:07 pm by Dan Flynn
 He was preceded by E.F, Kruse who took the reins in 1919. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
  (…) These actions – 1) interacting with the customer, 2) taking the order, 3) processing the order to the third party seller, 4) collecting the money, and 5) being paid a percentage of the sale – are consistent with a retailer or a distributor of consumer goods. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
The claimant, A.B., is the 15-year-old child of the respondents, C.D. and E.F. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:46 am by Richard Hunt
Halloween is a month away, but the candy is on the shelves at our local grocery stores and the courts are already delivering tricks and treats for those of us concerned with accessibility lawsuits. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 1 conference)   C.D., E.F., and G.H. v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
In 2014, a medallion to operate a taxi in New York City cost about $1 million. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 3:12 pm by Melissa Perry (CA)
E.F. was a 58 year old woman who applied to the Alberta Court of the Queen’s Bench in April of 2016 seeking judicial authorization to access MAiD. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Excerpts: Introduction and Gilbert & Gubar; Reconfiguring the Madwoman (pp 1-9, 21-23)[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
 273 (1) et 273 (2) b) C.Cr.). [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
  *****************************   On August 6, 2015, without fanfare, the SEC Division of Corporation Finance issued an interpretative letter to Citizen VC[1] and posted several updates to the Division’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (the “Companion C&DIs”[2]), all concerning the nuts and bolts of exempt private offerings, principally under Rule 506(b).[3]  The first wave of professional commentary was uniformly positive, applauding the SEC… [read post]