Search for: "EC v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am
In addition, it analyses how the Brussels IIb Regulation optimises the provisions of the 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction between the member states of the European Union. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC summarily states that a “hypothetical monopolist of accessible luxury handbags likely would undertake a SSNIPT on consumers” and could do so profitably. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
Now, the EC has assumed that competence (Article 66(2)). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Art. 4 CTMR Since the contested trade mark was filed in 1998, the old CTMR (Regulation (EC) No 40/94) applied. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
A late complication has arisen unfortunately concerning a Tudor painted roof/ceiling, which, although it will not affect the grant of the faculty may impact on the precise timing of the commencement of works which is dealt with in the Conditions”, The petition sought permission: (i) to install lavatories in the north transept in an area near to the organ, (ii) to enclose the chapel space in the eastern bay of the north transept to create a sound-proof room which can be heated… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:56 am
While the Court commented that they did not foresee imposing a general monitoring obligation on platforms, Arnold LJ stated that “Many providers wish to undertake content review for their own commercial reasons, however. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 8:43 am
Reminder of IPKat event ‘(Re-)discovering the copyright basics – Originality after THJ v Sheridan’ (14 March)The IPKat is thrilled to announce that, in the evening of 14 March 2024, a stellar panel has been gathered to discuss the Court of Appeal of England and Wales judgment in THJ v Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354 regarding copyright originality in certain graphic user interfaces (GUIs). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
In the Optis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
However, the court contested this, stating that, just because this is an uncustomary rule, this does not signify that it is extraneous. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am
Ratification by more states in which a talaq is a legally effective form of divorce and by more European states would provide the much-needed security for families moving from Islamic states to Europe. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Similarly, in SRB v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
State, 346 Ga. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
CommentAs stated, this is going to be a key referral for the (further) construction – and de facto unification (!) [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am
” In a nutshell, the message is that each Member State is free to go its own way. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:17 am
The Court of Appeal considered the same case law as the lower courts, with the addition of SC, CB and 8 children v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others [2021] UKSC 26. [read post]
