Search for: "Early v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 18,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
If a government official identifies themselves as such on their account, but lacks the authority to act on behalf of the state, there is no state action. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:39 pm
But internal calls are growing for the police chief to step aside as University of California President Michael V. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:35 am
The court relied on In re Estate of Jurgens, 31 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1948) and Noe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
The regulation has remained largely unchanged since 1865, and the near-total abortion ban was codified into Arizona state law in the early 20th century. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
Things shifted in the early 1900s as courts became more sympathetic to state regulation to protect public health and morals, and one of the key drivers of that shift was legislation aimed at regulating drug use. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
In this case, Patou had adduced a large amount of evidence regarding the period from 2013-2017 (including awards, accolades, social media posts, press cuttings and invoices for marketing campaigns), but also documents from as early as the late 1990s, which went towards the historical significance of the JOY mark. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
In the past day, the encampment, which sits between John V. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Nichols had known Egilman in the early 1980s, when he was at NIOSH, in Cincinnait. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
Nor did empire and the pioneering of early forms of capitalism stay outside of the imperial centre. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:04 pm
From Kratovil v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:18 am
LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am
In Bufkin v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
One theme of my marijuana seminar is how the US Supreme Court has largely stayed out of broad legal uncertainties relating to marijuana reform for the past two decades (after very significant early rulings in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
The first instance court was unmoved by the existence of parallel proceedings in the BVI, as the BVI proceedings were at a very early stage and hence were not a significant factor in the analysis on forum conveniens.[14] However, as mentioned above, the BVI insolvency proceedings had been recognised as a ‘foreign main proceeding’ by the Singapore court. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Michael Dreeben argues for the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
While the contours of the doctrine are still murky, early predictions suggest it will function to substantially curtail the scope of the administrative state. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
In P.D. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Most pertinently, Idaho v. [read post]
